Allen T. Brinmade to Thaddeus Stevens, 9 January 1867, (Wilmington: Scholarly Resources, 1993).
Transciber: Thomas Cullen and Proofreader: Blake Hunter
The following letter accentuates the importance of Radical Republican Affiliation during this time period. It signifies both Steven’s influence over his own subordinates as well over the political apparatus as a whole. Judge Spaulding is criticized for his biased removal of a political adversary in an attempt to gain an upper hand in their Congressional election race. By informing Steven’s of this "wrongdoing", Brinsmade is bringing it to the attention of one of the most influential men in his party, thus emphasizing the far reaching control of the Radical Republicans. By not being a member of the Republican party Spaulding is an easy target. The letter sheds light on both Steven’s own political influence within the party, as his endorsement is sufficient enough to sway the election, and the overall influence of the Republicans throughout the old Union.
Cleveland Jan 9th. 67
Honorable Thaddeus Stevens
Washington D.C.
Sir:
I desire to state for your benefit hereafter that -- Judge Spaulding was privy to the removal of Hon R.C. Parsons our former Coll. Of Int. Rev – who is a strong radical Republican, and succeeded in getting one Henry N. Johnson appointed instead. Mr. Parsons was his (Spauldings) opponent in the Congressional fight in this district and would have beaten him for the nomination, were it not for your letter endorsing the Judge.
It is perhaps needless for me to say that the Union men of this district, approve of your course, and repudiate the Judge.
His fulsome praise of the Secy of the Treasy in his late speech was simply made for the purpose of controlling the appointments in this district -- which he does.
Very Respectfully
Your obdt. servt.
Allen T. Brinsmade?
(benson/HST41/gold/stevens4.htm)