Secession Era Editorials Project
Kentucky, Journal [American]
(28 May 1856)
[pointing finger] The assault of Brooks upon
Sumner in the Senate Chamber has created a prodigious
excitement throughout the North.
The assault is deeply to be regretted, because in the first place it was a
very great outrage in itself, and because in the second place it will,
especially if not promptly and properly punished at Washington, greatly strengthen the anti-slavery and anti-
Southern feeling in the Northern States and thus help the Black Republican
It may be said with truth that Sumner, in his
speech against Butler, Douglas, and others, transcended the legitimate freedom of
He certainly did, but that was properly the Senate's business.
It is monstrous that a member of the House of Representatives should beat a
Senator upon the floor of the Senate for a speech made in the Senate and having
no reference to the individual administering the punishment.
Sumner's speech, violent and incendiary and
disgraceful as it was, was certainly no worse in its personalities than the
speeches of Douglas have habitually been; and then
its personalities, shameful as they were, had at least the advantage of being
expressed in a style of scholarship greatly in contrast with the slipshod
billingsgate of the Illinois Senator.
We have no sympathy for Sumner.
He has deported himself as a pestilent enemy of the peace and harmony of the
country and no doubt deserved more punishment than he has received, yet every
consideration of propriety and of the public good demands that Mr. Brooks shall be expelled from the House of
The Senate should deem his expulsion necessary to the maintenance of its
dignity and its rights.
And if the House should refuse to expel him, we think the Senate would be
right in withdrawing from the members of the House the privileges they now
enjoy upon the floor of the Senate.
We are not surprised to see that the people of South
Carolina are holding meetings and passing resolutions in approbation of
Mr. Brooks's conduct.
They are a violent people, and we don't think they ever fail to approve an
act of violence against what they hate -- whether it be a man, a party, a law,
Constitution of the United States.
U. S. Constitution ordains that a member of Congress shall not
be called to account for words spoken in debate, and Mr. Brooks has sworn to support this very
Constitution which he deliberately violated in the Capitol where the oath was
taken, breaking his oath and violating the Constitution and perpetrating what
looks like an act of gross cowardice, all at the same time, and yet the Soutch Carolina Democracy resolve
that for his conduct he is worthy of all praise.
This only proves, that, bad as the representative may be, he is no worse
than the State he represents.
We do not believe that Senator Butler approves
the conduct of his nephew.
Sumner's bitter attack upon Mr. Butler in that gentleman's absence was
contemptible, and contempt would have been a very proper punishment to be meted
out for it.
The absurd and wicked resolutions which the South
Carolina people are adopting will serve only to exasperate to a still
greater degree the public sentiment of the North.
But this is what the South Carolinians want.
They rejoice in whatever seems likely to promote the dissolution of the
There were twice as many traitors in South
Carolina in the days of the Revolution as in any other State in
proportion to population, and we think that her soil as a
general rule grows worse men now than it did then.
This document was produced as part of a document analysis project
by Lloyd Benson, Department of History, Furman University.
(Proofing info: Lloyd Benson.)
This electronic version may not be copied, or linked to, or otherwise used for commercial purposes, (including textbook or publication-related websites)
without prior written permission. The views expressed in this
document are for educational, historical, and scholarly use only,
and are not intended to represent the views of the project contributors or